6/7/2023 0 Comments Emacs vs viYou can also use actions, such as: dw to delete a word, cw to change a word, i to enter insert mode, or r to replace a character. This includes cursor movement commands, such as: $ to move to the end of the line, 0 to move to the beginning of the line, w to move forward a word, of b to move backwards a word. Tada! Now you simply need to hit the ESC key, and you can edit the command line using many common vi bindings. This is accomplished by running the following at the Bash prompt: The default is emacs-mode, but you can easily change it to vi-mode. However, what if you’re not handy with emacs bindings, but vi bindings? What then?įortunately, you can change the command line editing mode used by Bash. You don’t need to retype it, or tediously use the arrow keys to go back character-by-character. You can use the emacs key bindings to go back and efficiently edit your command line. If you’re handy with the emacs editor, you already know the answer. There are many capable GUI editors available (Kate is very popular) and IDEs, either which may end up being more suitable in some situations.Ever find yourself at the Bash prompt, typing out a very long series of arguments or parameters, only to hideously misspell something at the beginning on the line? One last thing: don't expect to be "stuck" with whatever choice you make. Follow examples of the leaders, which likely means learning one or both, but don't feel like you can't be a power uesr if you just don't "get it" with them. Elitism is ugly, no matter where you find it. ![]() I agree that those are useful and certainly indicative of a power user, but I've seen "power users" who struggle with either one. This will help in two ways: (1) you can get a feel for which tool best suits the direction in which you are travelling, and (2) you'll be less hindered if you find yourself in an enviroment without your eventual choice.Įdit to add: beware of "one of the requirements of that is Vi or Emacs". I would recommend that you develop some basic familiararity with both tools, with minimal (or no) extra plugins are extensions. ![]() Since the editor is a tool, then you choose the tool that best suits you and what you want to accomplish. The further you get from "newbie", (generally) the more speicialized your workflow becomes. In my opinion, there's not just one class of "power user". This is actually a good question, just not in the "one is universally betther than the other" sense. I'm coming in late, but I hope this gets some visiblity. Take advantage of this by using emacs daemon mode and emacs client command line aliases. Vim has some 'server mode' features and multiple buffer support, but it's very primitive compared to Emacs. The chances of newbies actually getting any benefit from that stuff is extremely small.Įmacs's ability to edit multiple files at the same time and handle buffers is far superior to Vim. If you read about stuff talking about how awesome icicles is on the Wiki, ignore it. Things like 'ido' is a massive usability enhancement as it allows you to get preview to possible commands as you type them out. ![]() This should set up common customizations such as cleaning up the UI, installing ido-ubiquitous and a few other things. I am just using 'starter-kit' from Marmalade. ![]() There are a few floating around, see if you can get one that has been updated recently. The default Emacs out of the box experience is pretty miserable. See if you can find a good 'Emacs starter kit'. If you want to edit files remotely do not use remote X11 or SSH command line if you can avoid it. It works fine, but the X11 version of Emacs has better functionality, is prettier, and faster. I use Melpa, GNU elpa, and Marmalade Emacs repos.ĭo NOT use Emacs in a terminal. It's not perfect as sometimes you can run into packages that have had bad patches recently and such things, but it's better then using distro's packages. but avoid using distro package management for extensions. It's fine to use the OS distro to install Emacs if it's a recent version. Use Emacs package management, not distros. I also have a key bound to toggle evil on and off in case I run into a mode that conflicts. Also Emac's native package management has also matured massively. Evil is a superior Vi interface for Emacs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |